BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CEPPA - ECPv6.15.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CEPPA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CEPPA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230504T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230504T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121937
CREATED:20221209T070749Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230325T134455Z
UID:10000388-1683216000-1683221400@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Eric Martin (Baylor)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: Scientism and Humanities Education \nAbstract: In this talk I discuss a pedagogical implication of scientism. Because scientism elevates science and derogates what is deemed non-scientific\, the arts and humanities become\, on such a view\, less valuable parts of university curricula. I survey some of the current data on declining study of the humanities and explain how scientism may contribute to a trend disparaging the arts and humanities\, suggesting some problems with this view.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-eric-martin-baylor/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230427T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230427T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121937
CREATED:20221207T210146Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230420T200550Z
UID:10000386-1682611200-1682616600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Jordan MacKenzie (Virginia Tech)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: Humorlessness and Moral Recognition \nAbstract: We’re often quick to point fingers at people who fail to find humor in themselves. And our accusations have a moral tinge: we decry people for being sanctimonious buzzkills\, and command them to  ‘get over themselves’. But are these moralized reactions justified? And what\, if anything\, justifies them? In this paper I argue that humourlessness often is a moral failing. This is because humorlessness often involves a disrespectful failure or refusal to engage with other peoples’ perspectives. I’ll then explore what implication this account has for accusations of humorlessness in oppressive social contexts\, and I’ll argue that one of the harms of oppression is that it makes having a sense of humor towards oneself morally risky.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-jordan-mackenzie/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Ben Sachs":MAILTO:bas7@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230420T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230420T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121937
CREATED:20221207T205805Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230407T084853Z
UID:10000385-1682006400-1682011800@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Bart Streumer (University of Groningen)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: “Superspreading the Word”.\n\nAbstract: Quasi-realists are expressivists who say much of what realists say. To avoid making their view indistinguishable from realism\, however\, they usually stop short of saying everything realists say. Many realists therefore think that something important is missing from quasi-realism. I will argue that quasi-realists can undermine this thought by defending a version of quasi-realism that I will call super-quasi-realism. This version seems indistinguishable from realism\, but I will argue that this is a mistaken impression that arises because we cannot believe super-quasi-realism.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-bart-streumer-university-of-groningen/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230419T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230419T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20230412T161357Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230412T161357Z
UID:10000389-1681909200-1681912800@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Special MPRG - Bart Streumer (Groningen)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: QUASI-REALISM FOR REALISTS \nAbstract: Reductive realists think that normative properties are identical to descriptive properties. But they are often charged with being relativists: it is often argued that their view implies that when two people make conflicting normative judgements\, these judgements can both be true. I will argue that reductive realists can answer this charge by copying the quasi-realist moves that many expressivists make. \nIn §1 I will outline the two main versions of realism\, reductive realism and robust realism\, and I will explain why reductive realists are often charged with being relativists. In §2 I will outline the quasi-realist moves that many expressivists make. In §3 I will argue that if these moves work\, reductive realists can copy them in order to answer the charge that they are relativists. In §4 I will discuss the assumptions behind these moves. In §5 I will discuss robust realists’ doubts about these moves. In §6 I will show that if my arguments are sound\, expressivism is closer to relativism than is often assumed.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/special-mprg-bart-streumer-groningen/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230419T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230419T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20230419T181902Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230419T181902Z
UID:10000390-1681891200-1681923600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:5th Annual CEPPA Graduate Conference (St Andrews) – 30-31 May\, 2023
DESCRIPTION:5th Annual CEPPA Graduate Conference  \n30-31 May\, 2023\, at the University of St Andrews  \n\nThe Centre for Ethics\, Philosophy\, and Public Affairs (CEPPA) is proud to host the 5th Annual CEPPA Graduate Conference at the University of St Andrews (UCO: School V). The event will be held in-person with the option for spectators to join online. Registration will open once the schedule has been finalised (hopefully\, by the end of April). A book of abstracts\, too\, will be made available on this page.  \n\nKeynote speakers:   \n\nDr Lucy McDonald (Research Fellow in Philosophy at St. John’s College\, University of Cambridge)\nDr Barry Maguire (Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at University of Edinburgh)\n\nThis page will be updated with a list of confirmed postgraduate speakers shortly. Please direct any inquiries to ceppaconference@st-andrews.ac.uk. \nBest wishes from the organisers\, \nPatrick J. Winther-Larsen and Katherine Crone\nPhD Students at the University of St Andrews & Stirling (SASP)
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/5th-annual-ceppa-graduate-conference-st-andrews-30-31-may-2023/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/files/2016/04/CEPPA.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230413T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230413T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221207T205510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230406T051645Z
UID:10000384-1681401600-1681407000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Daniel Muñoz (UNC Chapel Hill)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: Values as Vectors \nAbstract: Often\, two things seem tied in value\, though slightly improving one would not break the tie. How can we model such ‘insensitivity to sweetening’? A leading answer is that overall values\, rather than being like precise numbers\, must be imprecise\, giving rise to a special nontransitive value relation\, which Chang calls parity. But parity is notoriously hard to pin down\, and imprecise values are neither necessary nor sufficient for modeling sweetening. I propose instead to model overall values as many-dimensional vectors. The result is a fresh and flexible framework for the stranger side of ethics—as well as an elegant definition of parity as a tie between things of nonfungible value.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-munoz/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230412T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230412T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221017T104741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230412T072304Z
UID:10000376-1681304400-1681308000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Special MPRG: Mattia Cecchinato
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: “The Mind that Matters: Degrees of Sentience and Moral Status”. \nAbstract: It is often argued that the capacity for conscious experience is necessary for a creature to morally matter for its own sake and thus have moral status. Entities that lack the capacity for consciousness\, such as chairs\, philosophical zombies\, or anencephalic infants\, seem to lack all subjectivity and welfare concerns—nothing can be good or bad for them. But is the morally relevant property the general fact of being (phenomenally) conscious as such\, or is it a particular kind of consciousness that matters? According to a long and widespread philosophical tradition\, Narrow Sentientism\, the ground of moral status is the capacity for affective consciousness (i.e. emotions\, pleasure\, and pain). David Chalmers (2022)\, however\, has recently challenged this view by arguing for Broad Sentientism\, according to which the capacity for phenomenal consciousness alone suffices for moral status\, even in cases where the capacity for affect is absent. \nIn this talk\, I examine both views in light of recent evolutionary and philosophical arguments concerning the possibility of degrees of consciousness (Tye 2021; Lee 2022). I propose that the most compelling understandings of Narrow and Broad Sentientism are scalar versions of each. But I also argue that if (i) we can distinguish between affective and phenomenal consciousness\, and if (ii) both are gradable\, then trade-offs reveal the inadequacy of Scalar-Broad Sentientism. A highly conscious creature with a low degree of affect would not score well in terms of moral status. The view of moral status that better tracks our intuitions across a range of cases\, I argue\, is a version of Scalar-Narrow Sentientism. It is a function of the degree of affect weighted by the size of the phenomenal repertoire possessed by the relevant conscious creature. Finally\, I investigate the practical implications of this novel view for our treatment of non-human animals\, our fellows humans\, and artificial sentience.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/special-mprg-mattia-cecchinato/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230406T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230406T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221207T205231Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230403T120413Z
UID:10000383-1680796800-1680802200@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online only) – Catherine Elgin (Harvard)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Teams (online only) \nTitle: Epistemic Dynamics \nAbstract: Epistemic agents are finite and fallible.  Our range is limited and some of what we accept is\, no doubt\, flawed.  To achieve our epistemic and practical objectives\, we devise methods and practices that foster correction\, refinement\, and expansion of our current epistemic commitments. Traditional epistemology maintains that epistemic acceptability requires non-fortuitously justified true belief\, where non-fortuitousness insures that the justification and the truth maker align. If so\, reflective equilibrium is at best indicative of acceptability.  I argue otherwise.   Reflective equilibrium is constitutive of epistemic acceptability.  Because a network of cognitive commitments in reflective equilibrium is as reasonable as any available alternative in the epistemic circumstances\, it is worthy of acceptance.  That does not make it perfect or permanently acceptable.  Such a network is susceptible of and probably in need of improvement.  But it is the best we can currently do and provides a suitable platform for improvement.  I argue that such a network should be designed to foster\, not merely to allow for\, further gains.  It should support epistemic leveraging.  That requires that it enable critical reflection about its own ends and means\, enabling epistemic agents to recognize opportunities for and obstacles to improvement. \nCo-hosted with ECT.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-only-elgin/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Viviane Fairbank":MAILTO:vf45@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230323T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230323T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221207T204535Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230313T150600Z
UID:10000382-1679587200-1679592600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online only) – Edwin Etieyibo (University of the Witwatersrand)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Teams (online only) \nTitle: Disharmony as a Political Vice \nAbstract: In this presentation\, I examine two important concepts\, those of harmony and disharmony by drawing on some thoughts including in three areas of African philosophical ideas and understanding. While I take harmony as virtuous or at least valuable or desirable\, I take disharmony as vicious or at least dis-valuable or not desirable. I discuss the desirability of harmony and non-desirability of disharmony and the African Union as exemplification of political practice in Africa in advancing the view that disharmony is a vice\, in general and a political vice\, in particular\, insofar as it undermines the proper practice of politics in Africa.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-only-edwin-etieyibo-university-of-the-witwatersrand/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Joe Millum":MAILTO:jrm39@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230309T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230309T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220704T090838Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230301T123757Z
UID:10000352-1678377600-1678383000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Sigrún Svavarsdóttir (Tufts)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: “On Seeking Objective Grounds for Moral Evaluation” \nAbstract: The paper argues that to do justice to questions of objectivity that arise within and about moral discourse\, we must take into account that this discourse is embedded within a somewhat conventionally regimented practice that comprises attempts to guide attitude and action by way of justifying\, criticizing\, validating\, or excusing them. The appropriate condition of objectivity rules out a specific narrow kind of response-dependence that would run counter to this kind of guiding role for moral verdicts. The relevant condition is identified (the discourse- and practice-independence condition or\, for short\, the DP-independence condition).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-sigrun-svavarsdottir-tufts/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230202T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230202T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221207T203751Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230126T170728Z
UID:10000381-1675353600-1675359000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) – Christoph Schuringa (Northeastern University London)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: Karl Marx and the Actualization of Philosophy \nAbstract: Marx’s Eleventh Thesis on Feuerbach famously states that ‘The philosophers have thus far merely interpreted the world; the point is to change it.’ In this talk\, I begin to clear away some obstacles that stand in the way of an appreciation of the sense in which Marx thinks philosophy is to be practical. What emerges is an improved understanding of the Eleventh Thesis\, which can then be aligned with Marx’s call for the ‘actualization of philosophy’. Philosophy will turn out to have been\, all along\, praxis; contemplation will show up as privative with respect to philosophy actualized.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-christoph-schuringa-northeastern-university-london/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230126T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230126T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221207T203247Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230112T163428Z
UID:10000380-1674748800-1674754200@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online only) – Lea Ypi (LSE)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Teams (online only) \nTitle: Kant the Racist? \nAbstract: This paper examines Kant’s thoughts on race considering his analysis of teleology. It explains how Kant analysed the development of human races in connection to his account of the development of “germs” and “dispositions” in the human species. It further explains how that theory changed with the introduction of Kant’s analysis of reflective judgment. The paper argues that the important shifts in Kant’s analysis of teleology after the third Critique had crucial implications for Kant’s assessment of the development of human races and limit the scope of the charges of racism his theories have recently received.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-only-lea-ypi-lse/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Johannes Nickl":MAILTO:jmn20@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230119T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230119T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221114T204445Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230109T112159Z
UID:10000378-1674144000-1674149400@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) - Tom Simpson (Oxford)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: ‘Should political discrimination be unlawful?’
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-tom-simpson-oxford/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221215T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221215T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221207T201729Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221213T060843Z
UID:10000379-1671120000-1671125400@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online only) – Tyler Cowen (George Mason University)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Teams (online only) \nTitle: The Philosophy of Effective Altruism \nAbstract: What are the strengths and weaknesses of Effective Altruism as both a moral philosophy and practical guide to action? Is it best thought of as an optimizing approach? How important is existential risk\, especially relative to maximizing economic growth? How does the new form of Effective Altruism differ from standard utilitarianism?
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-only-tyler-cowen-george-mason-university/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Luca Stroppa":MAILTO:ls330@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221207T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221207T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000368-1670418000-1670421600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-12-07/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221201T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221201T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20221021T090719Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221122T112109Z
UID:10000375-1669910400-1669915800@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (in person) - Jules Holroyd (Sheffield)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Edgecliffe G03 \nTitle: Proleptic Praise \nAbstract: What is praise? I argue that we can make progress by examining what praise does. Functionalist views of praise are emerging\, but I here argue that by foregrounding cases in which expressions of praise are rejected by their direct target\, we see that praise has a wider\, and largely neglected\, social function. First I introduce cases in which praise is rejected. Then\, I identify a series of desiderata for an analysis of praise by bringing these cases into contact with existing views about what praise is and does. Finally I develop a functionalist account and show how it can meet these desiderata. In outline\, my claim is that one key function of praise is to exert social pressure by bestowing esteem. I tease out some mechanisms via which praise exerts social pressure\, and is particularly difficult to challenge. This analysis is responsive to\, and places at the foreground of our analysis\, the possibility that praise can be used for bad and oppressive ends. \nCo-hosted with ECT.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-in-person-jules-holroyd-sheffield/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03\, The Scores\, St Salvator's Quad\, KY16 9AL
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Viviane Fairbank":MAILTO:vf45@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221130T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221130T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000367-1669813200-1669816800@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-11-30/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221123T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221123T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000366-1669208400-1669212000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-11-23/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221123T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221123T110000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T153243Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T153243Z
UID:10000374-1669197600-1669201200@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Cover to Cover Reading Group (The Rejected Body)
DESCRIPTION:For S1 of 2022-23\, we are reading Wendell’s The Rejected Body. \nDay/time: Wednesdays 10-11am (starting the 5th of October).\nLocation: Teams.\nOrganizer: Lara Jost (laj7).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/cover-to-cover-reading-group-the-rejected-body/2022-11-23/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221117T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221117T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220704T090622Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221117T081847Z
UID:10000351-1668700800-1668706200@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online) – Zoë Johnson King (Harvard)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Working on Yourself\n\nAbstract: This is a thesis-antitheses-synthesis kind of talk. We begin with a question: How should one react to one’s own moral achievements and moral failures\, and to the moral achievements and moral failures of other people? One answer that might seem initially compelling is that we should be harsher on ourselves than we are on others: we should be modest about our own moral achievements while celebrating others’ moral achievements\, and we should show more leniency in response to others’ moral failures than in response to our own. As compelling as this answer might seem\, a smorgasbord of recent trends in popular moral thought push back against it in various ways\, and it paints an odd picture of how good people are supposed to talk to each other. That’s the thesis and its antitheses. The synthesis is the central idea of this talk: the idea of working on yourself. I’ll say what working on yourself is and why it matters morally\, and I’ll also introduce the idea of a deliberate self-improvement\, which is my name for what you bring about when you try to work on yourself and succeed. With these two notions in hand\, I’ll argue that the initially-compelling answer and its intuitive counterphenomena can all be accommodated by an account that emphasizes the importance of not only working on yourself\, but also encouraging and facilitating others’ work on themselves\, all while recognizing the enormous diversity of impediments to their doing either of these that particular individuals might encounter. We’ll see that some apparent self/other asymmetries have solid metaphysical or moral underpinnings\, while others dissolve. I’ll then discuss some cool upshots and one remaining deeper puzzle; in brief\, the puzzle concerns whether we should prioritize working on ourselves over supporting others’ work on themselves and\, if so\, what could explain this division of labor.\nCo-hosted with ECT.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-zoe-johnson-king/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Nick Kuespert":MAILTO:nk94@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221116T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221116T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000365-1668603600-1668607200@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-11-16/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221116T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221116T110000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T153243Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T153243Z
UID:10000373-1668592800-1668596400@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Cover to Cover Reading Group (The Rejected Body)
DESCRIPTION:For S1 of 2022-23\, we are reading Wendell’s The Rejected Body. \nDay/time: Wednesdays 10-11am (starting the 5th of October).\nLocation: Teams.\nOrganizer: Lara Jost (laj7).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/cover-to-cover-reading-group-the-rejected-body/2022-11-16/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221109T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221109T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000364-1667998800-1668002400@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-11-09/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221109T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221109T110000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T153243Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T153243Z
UID:10000372-1667988000-1667991600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Cover to Cover Reading Group (The Rejected Body)
DESCRIPTION:For S1 of 2022-23\, we are reading Wendell’s The Rejected Body. \nDay/time: Wednesdays 10-11am (starting the 5th of October).\nLocation: Teams.\nOrganizer: Lara Jost (laj7).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/cover-to-cover-reading-group-the-rejected-body/2022-11-09/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221103T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221103T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220704T090429Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221012T204502Z
UID:10000294-1667491200-1667496600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online only) – David Boonin (University of Colorado Boulder)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Teams (online only) \nTitle: Two Puzzles About the Ethics of Divestment \nAbstract: Suppose you own stock in Acme Corp. and you learn that it consistently acts in seriously immoral ways. What should you do? A common answer maintains that owning stock in Acme Corp. makes you complicit in its immoral behavior and that you should therefore divest yourself of it. But as Steven M. Cahn has argued\, there seems to be something puzzling about this answer. If you sell your stock to someone\, then they will own it. If it’s wrong to own the stock\, then they’ll be doing something wrong. So if you divest yourself of the stock\, you’ll be helping someone do something wrong. But it seems wrong to help someone do something wrong. So how can a company’s immoral behavior make it wrong for you to own stock in the company but not make it wrong for you to get rid of the stock by selling it to someone else? In this talk\, I will present two versions of Cahn’s divestment puzzle and explain the reasoning that leads to each of them. I will then discuss the published responses that have appeared since Cahn first presented the puzzle and argue that none of them succeed as solutions to either version. I will conclude by defending an alternative response to the puzzle.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-david-boonin-university-of-colorado-boulder/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Joel Joseph":MAILTO:jj73@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221102T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221102T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000363-1667394000-1667397600@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-11-02/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221102T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221102T110000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T153243Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T153243Z
UID:10000371-1667383200-1667386800@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Cover to Cover Reading Group (The Rejected Body)
DESCRIPTION:For S1 of 2022-23\, we are reading Wendell’s The Rejected Body. \nDay/time: Wednesdays 10-11am (starting the 5th of October).\nLocation: Teams.\nOrganizer: Lara Jost (laj7).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/cover-to-cover-reading-group-the-rejected-body/2022-11-02/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221026T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221026T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T152953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T152953Z
UID:10000362-1666789200-1666792800@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group
DESCRIPTION:Description: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time.\nDay/time: Wednesdays 1pm-2pm.\nLocation: Edgecliffe G03 and Teams.\nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-5/2022-10-26/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221026T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221026T110000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220919T153243Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220919T153243Z
UID:10000370-1666778400-1666782000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Cover to Cover Reading Group (The Rejected Body)
DESCRIPTION:For S1 of 2022-23\, we are reading Wendell’s The Rejected Body. \nDay/time: Wednesdays 10-11am (starting the 5th of October).\nLocation: Teams.\nOrganizer: Lara Jost (laj7).
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/cover-to-cover-reading-group-the-rejected-body/2022-10-26/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221020T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221020T173000
DTSTAMP:20260405T121938
CREATED:20220704T090051Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221006T174206Z
UID:10000292-1666281600-1666287000@ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk (online only) – Heather Battaly (University of Connecticut)
DESCRIPTION:Location: Teams (online only) \nTitle: Can Fanaticism be a Liberatory Virtue? \nAbstract: Quassim Cassam (2022a) and Paul Katsafanas (2019) have argued that fanaticism and extremism are normatively negative concepts—characterized by\, e.g.\, perverted ideals\, vicious closed-mindedness\, and unwarranted intolerance. I suggest an alternative approach that: (i) explains what makes fanaticism and extremism vicious in the very many cases in which they are; but also (ii) allows for cases in which fanaticism and extremism aren’t liberatory-vices and may even be liberatory-virtues. My hope is that this approach might serve as a resource for those in liberatory struggles.
URL:https://ceppa.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/event/ceppa-talk-online-heather-battaly-university-of-connecticut/
CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk
ORGANIZER;CN="Enrico Galvagni":MAILTO:eg240@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR